fraternity: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	campus Weight: 0.59 , body Weight: 0.59 , organization Weight: 0.58 , thing Weight: 0.58
Siblings	university Weight: 0.34 , greek Weight: 0.32 , association Weight: 0.32 , family member Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
have bad reputation	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(campus, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(fraternity, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(campus, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(campus, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(university, have bad reputation)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(university, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(campus, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(fraternity, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(university, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(university, has quality good)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(university, have bad reputation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(fraternity, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(fraternity, has quality bad)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, has quality bad)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(fraternity, has quality bad)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(fraternity, has quality bad)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(fraternity, have bad reputation)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, have bad reputation)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(fraternity, have bad reputation)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(fraternity, have bad reputation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(fraternity, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(campus, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(university, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(university, have bad reputation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(fraternity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(campus, has quality bad)