fraternity: have bad reputation

Related concepts

Parents	campus Weight: 0.59 , body Weight: 0.59 , organization Weight: 0.58 , thing Weight: 0.58
Siblings	university Weight: 0.34 , greek Weight: 0.32 , association Weight: 0.32 , family member Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have bad reputation	1.00
have reputation	0.97
has quality bad	0.81
has quality good	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(campus, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(fraternity, have bad reputation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(campus, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(campus, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(university, have bad reputation)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(university, have reputation)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(university, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(campus, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(fraternity, have bad reputation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(university, have reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(university, have reputation)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(university, have bad reputation)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(university, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(university, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(fraternity, have bad reputation)

Similarity expansion

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(fraternity, have reputation)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, has quality bad)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(fraternity, has quality bad)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(fraternity, has quality bad)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(fraternity, has quality bad)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(fraternity, have reputation)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(fraternity, has quality good)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(fraternity, have reputation)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(fraternity, has quality good)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, has quality good)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(fraternity, has quality good)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, have reputation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, have bad reputation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(fraternity, have bad reputation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(campus, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(university, have reputation)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(university, have bad reputation)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(university, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(fraternity, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(campus, has quality bad)