fry: taste cooked

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, cooking
Weight: 0.48
, place
Weight: 0.48
Siblings fried egg
Weight: 0.35
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.35
, eggs benedict
Weight: 0.34
, stew
Weight: 0.34
, steak
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste cooked 1.00
taste good cooked 0.98
taste freshly cooked 0.92
taste good freshly cooked 0.92
taste good 0.84
taste different 0.84
taste cold 0.83
taste bad 0.83
taste bad day 0.80
taste bad cold 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fry, taste cooked)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, taste bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(thing, taste bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(steak, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(fry, taste cooked)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(steak, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(steak, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(fry, taste cooked)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste good cooked)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(fry, taste bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste freshly cooked)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(fry, taste bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(fry, taste good cooked)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(fry, taste bad cold)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste bad cold)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fry, taste bad cold)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(fry, taste freshly cooked)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste cold)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(fry, taste cold)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(fry, taste good cooked)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fry, taste good cooked)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(fry, taste freshly cooked)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fry, taste bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fry, taste cold)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fry, taste bad cold)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fry, taste freshly cooked)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fry, taste cold)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(fry, taste good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fry, taste good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fry, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste cooked)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fry, taste cooked)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(steak, taste good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fry, taste cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)