functionalism: be important in psychology

Related concepts

Parents	term Weight: 0.50 , topic Weight: 0.50 , view Weight: 0.49 , theory Weight: 0.46 , approach Weight: 0.44
Siblings	constructivism Weight: 0.33 , theology Weight: 0.31 , formalism Weight: 0.31 , naturalism Weight: 0.31 , political ideology Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in psychology	1.00
be important to psychology	1.00
be to psychology	0.97
is psychology	0.97
be used in psychology	0.96
be important in history of psychology	0.96
be important in sociology	0.88
be important part of sociology	0.87
be used in developmental psychology	0.87
be needed in sociology	0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(theory, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in psychology)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(approach, be to psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in psychology)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.96

Plausible(theory, be important part of sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in psychology)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(theory, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in psychology)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(theory, be used in developmental psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in psychology)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(theory, be needed in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in psychology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(theory, be important in psychology)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(approach, be to psychology)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(theory, be important in sociology)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(theory, be used in developmental psychology)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(theory, be important part of sociology)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(theory, be needed in sociology)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(approach, be to psychology)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in psychology)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(theory, be used in developmental psychology)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in sociology)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(theory, be needed in sociology)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(theory, be important part of sociology)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, is psychology)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(theory, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(approach, be to psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(theory, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.96

Plausible(theory, be important part of sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(theory, be used in developmental psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(theory, be needed in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(constructivism, is psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(constructivism, is psychology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(functionalism, be important in psychology)

Similarity expansion

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important to psychology)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(functionalism, be important to psychology)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in sociology)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(functionalism, be important in sociology)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in psychology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(theory, be important in psychology)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(approach, be to psychology)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(theory, be important in sociology)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(theory, be used in developmental psychology)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(theory, be important part of sociology)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(theory, be needed in sociology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(constructivism, is psychology)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(theory, be important in psychology)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(approach, be to psychology)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(theory, be important in sociology)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(theory, be important part of sociology)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(theory, be used in developmental psychology)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(functionalism, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(theory, be needed in sociology)