functionalism: be important to psychology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.50
, topic
Weight: 0.50
, view
Weight: 0.49
, theory
Weight: 0.46
, approach
Weight: 0.44
Siblings constructivism
Weight: 0.33
, theology
Weight: 0.31
, formalism
Weight: 0.31
, naturalism
Weight: 0.31
, political ideology
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to psychology 1.00
be important in psychology 1.00
be to psychology 0.97
is psychology 0.97
be used in psychology 0.96
be important in history of psychology 0.95
be important in sociology 0.88
be important part of sociology 0.87
be used in developmental psychology 0.87
be needed in sociology 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important to psychology)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(approach, be to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important to psychology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(theory, be important part of sociology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important to psychology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(theory, be important in sociology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important to psychology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be used in developmental psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important to psychology)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be needed in sociology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important to psychology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in psychology)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(approach, be to psychology)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in sociology)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(theory, be important part of sociology)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theory, be used in developmental psychology)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theory, be needed in sociology)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(approach, be to psychology)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in psychology)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(theory, be used in developmental psychology)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in sociology)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(theory, be needed in sociology)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important part of sociology)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, is psychology)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(approach, be to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(theory, be important in sociology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(theory, be important part of sociology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be used in developmental psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be needed in sociology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(constructivism, is psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(constructivism, is psychology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(functionalism, be important to psychology)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(functionalism, be important in psychology)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in psychology)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(functionalism, be important in sociology)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in sociology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(functionalism, be important to psychology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(approach, be to psychology)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(theory, be important in psychology)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important in sociology)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be used in developmental psychology)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important part of sociology)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(theory, be needed in sociology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(constructivism, is psychology)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(theory, be important in psychology)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(approach, be to psychology)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important in sociology)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important part of sociology)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be used in developmental psychology)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(functionalism, be important to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(theory, be needed in sociology)