functionalism: be important in sociology

Related concepts

Parents	term Weight: 0.50 , topic Weight: 0.50 , view Weight: 0.49 , theory Weight: 0.46 , approach Weight: 0.44
Siblings	constructivism Weight: 0.33 , theology Weight: 0.31 , formalism Weight: 0.31 , naturalism Weight: 0.31 , political ideology Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in sociology	1.00
be important part of sociology	0.99
be needed in sociology	0.96
be important in psychology	0.88
be important to psychology	0.88
be important in history of psychology	0.86
be to psychology	0.85
is psychology	0.85
be used in psychology	0.85
be important in social sciences	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.96

Plausible(theory, be important part of sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in sociology)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(theory, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in sociology)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(theory, be needed in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in sociology)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(theory, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in sociology)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(approach, be to psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in sociology)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(theory, be important in social sciences) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in sociology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(theory, be important in sociology)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(theory, be important part of sociology)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(theory, be needed in sociology)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(theory, be important in psychology)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(approach, be to psychology)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(theory, be important in social sciences)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in sociology)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(theory, be needed in sociology)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(theory, be important part of sociology)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(approach, be to psychology)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in social sciences)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in psychology)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, is psychology)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(theory, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.96

Plausible(theory, be important part of sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(theory, be needed in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(theory, be important in psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(approach, be to psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(theory, be important in social sciences) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(constructivism, is psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(constructivism, is psychology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(functionalism, be important in sociology)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(functionalism, be important in psychology)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in psychology)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important to psychology)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(functionalism, be important to psychology)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in psychology)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important to psychology)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in psychology)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in history of psychology)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important to psychology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(functionalism, be important in sociology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(theory, be important in sociology)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(theory, be important part of sociology)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(theory, be needed in sociology)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(theory, be important in psychology)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(approach, be to psychology)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(theory, be important in social sciences)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(constructivism, is psychology)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(theory, be important in sociology)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(theory, be important part of sociology)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(theory, be needed in sociology)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(theory, be important in psychology)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(approach, be to psychology)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(functionalism, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(theory, be important in social sciences)