futurama: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents show
Weight: 0.57
, television show
Weight: 0.50
, example
Weight: 0.48
, cartoon
Weight: 0.47
, tv show
Weight: 0.44
Siblings talk show
Weight: 0.29
, game show
Weight: 0.28
, soap opera
Weight: 0.28
, fresh air
Weight: 0.28
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
have good quality 0.93
have quality 0.89
is quality 0.87
is bad now 0.84
look bad 0.79
is poor 0.78
be good for health 0.77
is terrible 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(futurama, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(show, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(futurama, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(cartoon, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(futurama, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(cartoon, is bad now)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(show, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cartoon, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cartoon, is bad now)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(show, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fresh air, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(big bang theory, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(soap opera, look bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(soap opera, is terrible)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fresh air, be good for health)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(futurama, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(show, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(futurama, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(cartoon, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(futurama, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(big bang theory, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(big bang theory, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fresh air, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(fresh air, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(talk show, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(fresh air, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(fresh air, be good for health)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(soap opera, look bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(soap opera, look bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(soap opera, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(soap opera, is terrible)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(futurama, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(futurama, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(futurama, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(futurama, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(futurama, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cartoon, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(show, is quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cartoon, is bad now)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(talk show, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(big bang theory, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fresh air, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fresh air, be good for health)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(soap opera, look bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(soap opera, is terrible)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cartoon, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(show, is quality)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(futurama, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cartoon, is bad now)