ganglion: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cyst
Weight: 0.53
, wrist
Weight: 0.43
, nervous system
Weight: 0.40
, process
Weight: 0.39
Siblings optic nerve
Weight: 0.29
, sciatic nerve
Weight: 0.29
, phagocytosis
Weight: 0.29
, motor neuron
Weight: 0.29
, brain
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
has quality right 0.90
has quality worse 0.84
has quality spot 0.79
has quality function 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(nervous system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ganglion, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ganglion, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nervous system, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ganglion, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(nervous system, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ganglion, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cyst, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ganglion, has quality good)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(nervous system, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cyst, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(nervous system, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(process, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nervous system, has quality worse)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cyst, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality worse)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(process, is quality)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(motor neuron, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(brain, has quality right)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(nervous system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(ganglion, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(nervous system, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(ganglion, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(ganglion, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cyst, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(ganglion, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nervous system, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(ganglion, has quality good)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(motor neuron, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(motor neuron, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(brain, has quality right) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(brain, has quality right)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(ganglion, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(ganglion, has quality worse)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ganglion, has quality worse)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ganglion, has quality worse)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality worse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ganglion, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality function)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cyst, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(brain, has quality right)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(motor neuron, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cyst, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ganglion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality worse)
...