garbage: affect climate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents waste
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.59
, mess
Weight: 0.58
Siblings human waste
Weight: 0.66
, banana peel
Weight: 0.58
, litter
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect climate 1.00
affect environment 0.87
be bad for environment 0.78
affect planet 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(waste, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(garbage, affect climate)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(garbage, affect climate)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(waste, affect environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(waste, affect environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be bad for environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(litter, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(waste, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(garbage, affect climate)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(garbage, affect climate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(litter, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(litter, affect environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(litter, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(litter, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(human waste, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(human waste, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(garbage, affect climate)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(garbage, affect environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect planet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(garbage, affect planet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(garbage, affect environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(garbage, affect planet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(garbage, affect planet)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(garbage, affect environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(garbage, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(garbage, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(garbage, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect climate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(garbage, affect climate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(waste, affect environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(waste, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(litter, affect environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(litter, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(human waste, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(waste, affect environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(garbage, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(waste, be bad for environment)