human waste: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents waste
Weight: 0.74
, garbage
Weight: 0.66
, refuse
Weight: 0.64
, debris
Weight: 0.63
, river
Weight: 0.61
Siblings garbage can
Weight: 0.35
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, compost
Weight: 0.34
, residue
Weight: 0.32
, slag
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
has quality good 0.77
look bad 0.76
be important for country 's economy 0.75
be good for earth 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(garbage, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(human waste, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(human waste, be bad for environment)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(garbage, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(human waste, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(waste, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(garbage, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(garbage, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(garbage, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(garbage, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(compost, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for earth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(garbage, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(human waste, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(human waste, be bad for environment)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(garbage, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(human waste, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(compost, be good for earth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(compost, be good for earth)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(compost, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(compost, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(human waste, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(human waste, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(waste, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(garbage, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(garbage, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(compost, be good for earth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(compost, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(waste, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(garbage, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(human waste, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(garbage, has quality good)