geography: affect culture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, subject
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.64
, culture
Weight: 0.63
, discipline
Weight: 0.63
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, mathematics
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.34
, biology
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect micmac culture 1.00
affect culture 1.00
affect culture of area 0.93
affect culture of region 0.93
affect ones culture 0.93
affect society 0.85
affect development of society 0.82
affects society 0.81
affect life 0.81
affect history 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(biology, affect society)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect life)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, affect life)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect culture)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, affect life)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(biology, affect life)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ecology, affect life)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect life)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(biology, affect society)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(biology, affect society)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(geography, affect culture)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect micmac culture)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture of area)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture of region)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect development of society)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(geography, affect culture of region)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect history)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(geography, affect culture of area)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(geography, affect history)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(geography, affect micmac culture)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(geography, affect culture of region)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(geography, affect culture of area)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(geography, affect culture of region)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(geography, affect culture of area)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(geography, affect history)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(geography, affect history)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(geography, affect micmac culture)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(geography, affect development of society)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(geography, affect development of society)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(geography, affect micmac culture)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(geography, affect development of society)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(geography, affect culture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ecology, affect culture)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, affect life)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ecology, affect life)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(biology, affect society)