geography: affect micmac culture

Related concepts

Parents	science Weight: 0.65 , subject Weight: 0.64 , department Weight: 0.64 , culture Weight: 0.63 , discipline Weight: 0.63
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.36 , mathematics Weight: 0.36 , meteorology Weight: 0.34 , biology Weight: 0.34 , ecology Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
affect micmac culture	1.00
affect culture	1.00
affect culture of area	0.93
affect culture of region	0.93
affect ones culture	0.93
affect society	0.85
affect development of society	0.82
affects society	0.81
affect life	0.81
affect history	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect culture)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(biology, affect society)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect life)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(biology, affect life)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(ecology, affect culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(ecology, affect culture)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(biology, affect society) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(biology, affect society)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(biology, affect life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(biology, affect life)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(ecology, affect life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(ecology, affect life)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(geography, affect micmac culture)

Similarity expansion

0.84

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(geography, affect culture)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(geography, affect culture)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(geography, affect culture of region)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(geography, affect culture of area)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(geography, affect culture)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(geography, affect culture of region)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(geography, affect culture of area)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(geography, affect history)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(geography, affect culture of region)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(geography, affect culture of area)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(geography, affect history)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(geography, affect development of society)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(geography, affect history)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(geography, affect development of society)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(geography, affect development of society)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture of area)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(geography, affect culture of region)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(geography, affect development of society)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(geography, affect history)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(geography, affect micmac culture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(geography, affect micmac culture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(ecology, affect culture)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(biology, affect life)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(ecology, affect life)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(geography, affect micmac culture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(biology, affect society)