habitat: be with biodiversity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.55
, charity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.73
, wetland
Weight: 0.71
, pond
Weight: 0.65
, freshwater
Weight: 0.65
, marsh
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with biodiversity 1.00
be with high biodiversity 0.97
be with biodiversity stable 0.93
be with biodiversity more stable 0.92
be with high biodiversity stable 0.90
be with high biodiversity more stable 0.89
biodiversity division threats 0.86
has state ecology 0.80
be important biome 0.77
benefit wildlife 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be important biome)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wetland, benefit wildlife)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(wetland, benefit wildlife)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(wetland, benefit wildlife)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(grassland, be important biome)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(grassland, be important biome)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity stable)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity more stable)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(habitat, biodiversity division threats)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity stable)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(habitat, biodiversity division threats)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(habitat, be with high biodiversity more stable)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(habitat, be with high biodiversity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has state ecology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(habitat, biodiversity division threats)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity stable)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity more stable)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(habitat, has state ecology)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(habitat, biodiversity division threats)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity stable)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity more stable)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(habitat, has state ecology)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(habitat, has state ecology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(wetland, benefit wildlife)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(grassland, be important biome)