habitat: biodiversity division threats

Property	Similarity
biodiversity division threats	1.00
be with biodiversity	0.86
be with high biodiversity	0.84
be with biodiversity stable	0.83
be with biodiversity more stable	0.82
be with high biodiversity stable	0.81
be with high biodiversity more stable	0.80

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity stable)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity more stable)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity stable)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity more stable)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity more stable)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity stable)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(habitat, be with high biodiversity more stable)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity stable)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(habitat, be with high biodiversity)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(habitat, biodiversity division threats) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity)

Parents	factor Weight: 0.62 , activity Weight: 0.56 , structure Weight: 0.55 , charity Weight: 0.55
Siblings	grassland Weight: 0.73 , wetland Weight: 0.71 , pond Weight: 0.65 , freshwater Weight: 0.65 , marsh Weight: 0.64

habitat: biodiversity division threats

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible