habitat: be with biodiversity more stable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.55
, charity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.73
, wetland
Weight: 0.71
, pond
Weight: 0.65
, freshwater
Weight: 0.65
, marsh
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with biodiversity more stable 1.00
be with biodiversity stable 0.99
be with high biodiversity more stable 0.98
be with high biodiversity stable 0.97
be with biodiversity 0.92
be with high biodiversity 0.92
biodiversity division threats 0.82
has state ecology 0.77
be important to ecosystem 0.77
be important to environment 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity more stable)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity stable)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity more stable)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity more stable)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity stable)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(habitat, be with high biodiversity more stable)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity stable)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(habitat, be with high biodiversity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity stable)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(habitat, biodiversity division threats)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(habitat, biodiversity division threats)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(habitat, be with high biodiversity stable)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(habitat, biodiversity division threats)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(habitat, biodiversity division threats)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(habitat, be important to ecosystem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(habitat, be with high biodiversity)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(habitat, has state ecology)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(habitat, be important to environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(habitat, be with high biodiversity)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with high biodiversity)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has state ecology)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(habitat, be important to ecosystem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(habitat, has state ecology)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(habitat, be important to environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(habitat, has state ecology)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(habitat, be important to ecosystem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be important to ecosystem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(habitat, be with biodiversity more stable)