hacker: learn hack

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents criminal
Weight: 0.63
, outsider
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.57
, third party
Weight: 0.57
, individual
Weight: 0.55
Siblings spammer
Weight: 0.33
, pickpocket
Weight: 0.32
, terrorist
Weight: 0.32
, thief
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
learn hack 1.00
hack instagram 0.92
hack 0.92
learn hacking 0.89
hack stuff 0.89
hack computer 0.88
continue hack 0.88
hack games 0.87
hack in games 0.86
hack computers 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(hacker, learn hack)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hacker, hack)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(hacker, hack)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hacker, hack instagram)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hacker, hack computers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack instagram)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hacker, hack games)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(hacker, hack computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hacker, hack games)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hacker, hack computers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(hacker, learn hacking)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(hacker, hack in games)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack games)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack computers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hacker, learn hacking)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hacker, hack computer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack computer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack computer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack instagram)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack in games)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack games)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack computers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack in games)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hacker, hack instagram)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hacker, hack in games)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(hacker, learn hacking)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hacker, learn hacking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(hacker, learn hack)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hacker, learn hack)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hacker, learn hack)