hacker: learn hacking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents criminal
Weight: 0.63
, outsider
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.57
, third party
Weight: 0.57
, individual
Weight: 0.55
Siblings spammer
Weight: 0.33
, pickpocket
Weight: 0.32
, terrorist
Weight: 0.32
, thief
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
learn hacking 1.00
learn hack 0.89
hack computer 0.82
hack computers 0.82
hack into computers 0.82
hack instagram 0.82
hack 0.82
hack in to company computers 0.80
hack in to big company computers 0.80
hack in games 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(hacker, learn hacking)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(hacker, learn hack)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hacker, hack)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(hacker, learn hack)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(hacker, hack)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hacker, hack computers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hacker, hack computers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(hacker, hack computer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(hacker, hack into computers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hacker, hack instagram)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack instagram)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack computers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack into computers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack computer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(hacker, hack in games)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(hacker, learn hack)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack computers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hacker, hack computer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack computer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(hacker, hack in games)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack into computers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hacker, learn hack)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(hacker, hack into computers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack instagram)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(hacker, hack in games)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hacker, hack in games)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hacker, hack instagram)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hacker, learn hacking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(hacker, learn hacking)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hacker, learn hacking)