hard drive: need formatting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disk drive
Weight: 0.79
, drive
Weight: 0.78
, computer disk
Weight: 0.68
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.67
Siblings floppy disk
Weight: 0.66
, save
Weight: 0.52
, flash memory
Weight: 0.34
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, personal computer
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
need formatting 1.00
lose space formatting 0.95
need formatted 0.81
is formatted 0.79
be formatted 0.79
need defragmenting 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hard drive, need formatting)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(drive, lose space formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hard drive, need formatting)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(drive, need formatted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hard drive, need formatting)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(drive, be formatted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hard drive, need formatting)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(drive, is formatted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hard drive, need formatting)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hard drive, need formatting)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(drive, need defragmenting)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(drive, need formatting)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(drive, lose space formatting)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(drive, is formatted)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(drive, be formatted)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(drive, need formatted)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(drive, lose space formatting)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drive, need defragmenting)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(drive, need formatting)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(drive, need formatted)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(drive, be formatted)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(drive, is formatted)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hard drive, need formatting)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(drive, lose space formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hard drive, need formatting)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(drive, need formatted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hard drive, need formatting)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(drive, is formatted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hard drive, need formatting)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(drive, be formatted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hard drive, need formatting)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hard drive, need formatting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(hard drive, need formatting)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, lose space formatting)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(hard drive, lose space formatting)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(hard drive, lose space formatting)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hard drive, lose space formatting)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(hard drive, is formatted)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hard drive, need formatted)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hard drive, need defragmenting)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hard drive, need defragmenting)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(hard drive, need formatted)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hard drive, is formatted)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hard drive, need defragmenting)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(hard drive, need formatted)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need formatted)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is formatted)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(hard drive, is formatted)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hard drive, need formatting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(drive, is formatted)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(drive, be formatted)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(drive, need formatting)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(drive, lose space formatting)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(drive, need formatted)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(drive, need defragmenting)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(drive, is formatted)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(drive, be formatted)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(drive, need formatting)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(drive, lose space formatting)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(drive, need formatted)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(drive, need defragmenting)