home: is more likely

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.61
, visit
Weight: 0.60
, facility
Weight: 0.59
, possession
Weight: 0.58
Siblings home depot
Weight: 0.70
, hotel room
Weight: 0.69
, home owner
Weight: 0.66
, condominium
Weight: 0.62
, bungalow
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more likely 1.00
is likely 0.95
be such as region state most likely 0.83
be such as region state likely 0.82
is more expensive 0.80
be more expensive than houses 0.77
be more successful than lowes 0.76
cost less 0.76
be in city more expensive 0.76
need one 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(field, be such as region state most likely)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(home, is more likely)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(field, be such as region state most likely)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(field, be such as region state most likely)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(home depot, be more successful than lowes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, be more expensive than houses)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(field, be such as region state most likely)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(home, is more likely)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(bungalow, be more expensive than houses)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bungalow, be more expensive than houses)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(home depot, be more successful than lowes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(home depot, be more successful than lowes)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(home, is more likely)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(home, be in city more expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(home, be in city more expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(home, be in city more expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(home, be in city more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(home, is more likely)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(home, is more likely)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(field, be such as region state most likely)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(home depot, be more successful than lowes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(bungalow, be more expensive than houses)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bungalow, is more expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(home, is more likely)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(field, be such as region state most likely)