bungalow: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents home
Weight: 0.61
, style
Weight: 0.53
, accommodation
Weight: 0.52
, place
Weight: 0.51
Siblings cottage
Weight: 0.35
, home depot
Weight: 0.34
, townhouse
Weight: 0.34
, hotel room
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.94
be more expensive than houses 0.89
is cheaper 0.86
cost more 0.85
be more stressful than work 0.81
is more likely 0.80
be in hawaii expensive 0.79
more efficient energy 0.78
be in copenhagen expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(home, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bungalow, is more expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(accommodation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bungalow, is more expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(home, is more likely) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bungalow, is more expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bungalow, is more expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(home, more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bungalow, is more expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(accommodation, be in hawaii expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bungalow, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(accommodation, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(accommodation, be in hawaii expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(home, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(home, is more likely)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(home, more efficient energy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be in hawaii expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(home, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(home, is more likely)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(home, more efficient energy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cottage, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, is cheaper)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(home, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(accommodation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(home, is more likely) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(home, more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(accommodation, be in hawaii expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hotel room, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(hotel room, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cottage, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cottage, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(townhouse, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(townhouse, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(townhouse, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(townhouse, is cheaper)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(bungalow, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bungalow, is expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(bungalow, be more expensive than houses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(bungalow, cost more)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bungalow, is cheaper)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(bungalow, is expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(bungalow, is expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bungalow, be more expensive than houses)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(bungalow, cost more)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(bungalow, cost more)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(bungalow, be more expensive than houses)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(bungalow, is cheaper)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(bungalow, is cheaper)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, cost more)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is cheaper)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, be more expensive than houses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bungalow, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(accommodation, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(accommodation, be in hawaii expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(home, more efficient energy)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(home, is more likely)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(home, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(townhouse, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(townhouse, is cheaper)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cottage, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hotel room, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(accommodation, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(home, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(home, is more likely)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(accommodation, be in hawaii expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(home, more efficient energy)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(bungalow, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(accommodation, be in copenhagen expensive)