idaho: is growing state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.59
, town
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wyoming
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, arkansas
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is growing state 1.00
is fastest growing state 0.84
be good for growing potatoes 0.80
has state state 0.76
be good place grow 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wyoming, has state state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(arkansas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(arkansas, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, has state state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(wyoming, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(idaho, is growing state)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is fastest growing state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be good for growing potatoes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(idaho, has state state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(idaho, is fastest growing state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be good place grow)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(idaho, is fastest growing state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(idaho, be good for growing potatoes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(idaho, has state state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(idaho, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(idaho, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(idaho, be good for growing potatoes)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(idaho, is fastest growing state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(idaho, be good place grow)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(idaho, be good place grow)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(idaho, be good place grow)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(idaho, be good for growing potatoes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is growing state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(idaho, is growing state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(arkansas, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is growing state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wyoming, has state state)