illinois: is failed state

Related concepts

Parents	country Weight: 0.62 , university Weight: 0.59 , north carolina Weight: 0.59 , michigan Weight: 0.59
Siblings	ohio Weight: 0.64 , indiana Weight: 0.64 , chicago Weight: 0.63 , south carolina Weight: 0.36 , florida Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is failed state	1.00
has state state	0.77
be called state	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(university, be called state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(illinois, is failed state)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(michigan, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(illinois, is failed state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(michigan, has state state)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(university, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(michigan, has state state)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(university, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(florida, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(university, be called state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

Remarkable(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(illinois, is failed state)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(michigan, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

Remarkable(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(illinois, is failed state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(florida, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(florida, has state state)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(illinois, is failed state)

Similarity expansion

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(illinois, has state state)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(illinois, has state state)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Salient(illinois, has state state)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.18

Remarkable(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(illinois, has state state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(illinois, is failed state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(illinois, is failed state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(university, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(florida, has state state)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(illinois, is failed state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(university, be called state)