illusion: be important in study

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reality
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.58
, trick
Weight: 0.56
, effect
Weight: 0.55
, matter
Weight: 0.55
Siblings space time
Weight: 0.43
, normality
Weight: 0.40
, myth
Weight: 0.34
, truth
Weight: 0.33
, theory
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in study 1.00
be important in study of perception 0.87
be important in theatre 0.79
be important in macbeth 0.79
be controlled in in drug study 0.79
be vital tools for researchers 0.79
be vital tools for developmental researchers 0.78
be important counselling 0.78
be important to geoligists 0.78
be important in science 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(effect, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(illusion, be important in study)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(effect, be important in theatre)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(illusion, be important in study)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(reality, be important in macbeth)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(illusion, be important in study)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(effect, be controlled in in drug study)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(illusion, be important in study)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(effect, be controlled in in drug study)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(reality, be important in macbeth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(effect, be important in theatre)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(effect, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(effect, be controlled in in drug study)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(effect, be important in theatre)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(reality, be important in macbeth)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(effect, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important counselling)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to geoligists)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(effect, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(illusion, be important in study)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(effect, be important in theatre)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(illusion, be important in study)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(reality, be important in macbeth)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(illusion, be important in study)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(effect, be controlled in in drug study)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(illusion, be important in study)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(theory, be important counselling)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(theory, be important counselling)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(illusion, be important in study)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(illusion, be important in study of perception)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be important in study of perception)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(illusion, be important in study of perception)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(illusion, be important in study of perception)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be important in study)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(illusion, be important in study)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(reality, be important in macbeth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(effect, be controlled in in drug study)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(effect, be important in theatre)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(effect, be important in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important counselling)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(theory, be vital tools for developmental researchers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(reality, be important in macbeth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(effect, be controlled in in drug study)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(effect, be important in theatre)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(illusion, be important in study)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(effect, be important in science)