imperial: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, part
Weight: 0.49
, stout
Weight: 0.47
Siblings royal
Weight: 0.32
, venture capitalist
Weight: 0.32
, banana republic
Weight: 0.31
, civilization
Weight: 0.31
, fiat
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality bad 0.82
has quality system 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(civilization, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fiat, has quality worth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(venture capitalist, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fiat, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fiat, has quality worth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(civilization, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(civilization, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fiat, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fiat, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(venture capitalist, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(venture capitalist, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(imperial, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(imperial, has quality system)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(imperial, has quality system)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(imperial, has quality system)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality system)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(imperial, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(imperial, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(imperial, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(imperial, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(civilization, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fiat, has quality worth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fiat, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(venture capitalist, has quality bad)