income: be low in cuba

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tax
Weight: 0.64
, determinant
Weight: 0.61
, allowance
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.61
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.80
, operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, unemployment
Weight: 0.66
, poverty
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be low in cuba 1.00
be high in quebec 0.77
be high in italy 0.77
be in uk high 0.77
be high in uk 0.77
be in greece high 0.77
be high in south africa 0.77
be in america 0.76
be in california high 0.76
be high in california 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(income, be low in cuba)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(tax, be high in california)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tax, be high in california)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in italy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be high in south africa)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in california)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(income, be low in cuba)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(income tax, be high in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in uk)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(unemployment, be high in italy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be high in italy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in quebec)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be high in south africa)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(poverty, be high in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(poverty, be high in south africa)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(income, be low in cuba)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(income, be low in cuba)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(income, be low in cuba)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tax, be high in california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in uk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(unemployment, be high in south africa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(poverty, be high in south africa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(unemployment, be high in italy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in quebec)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(income, be low in cuba) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tax, be high in california)