infidelity: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	topic Weight: 0.62 , behavior Weight: 0.62 , problem Weight: 0.61 , subject Weight: 0.58 , thing Weight: 0.57
Siblings	cheating Weight: 0.34 , sexual harassment Weight: 0.34 , alcoholism Weight: 0.33 , jealousy Weight: 0.33 , loneliness Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality wrong	0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(infidelity, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(loneliness, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(alcoholism, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(cheating, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(jealousy, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(cheating, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(infidelity, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(jealousy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(jealousy, has quality bad)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(cheating, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(cheating, has quality bad)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(cheating, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(cheating, has quality wrong)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(loneliness, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(loneliness, has quality bad)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(alcoholism, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(alcoholism, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Salient(infidelity, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(infidelity, has quality wrong)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.19

Salient(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(infidelity, has quality wrong)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality wrong)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(infidelity, has quality wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

Salient(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(infidelity, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(jealousy, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(cheating, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(loneliness, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(alcoholism, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(cheating, has quality wrong)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)