intolerance: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.58
, symptom
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.56
, theme
Weight: 0.55
Siblings lactose
Weight: 0.69
, apathy
Weight: 0.34
, bigotry
Weight: 0.34
, hatred
Weight: 0.33
, homophobia
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
is social problem 0.85
be different from problems 0.82
be research problem 0.82
be such problem in america 0.78
is issue 0.78
has state phobia 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(intolerance, has state problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(intolerance, has state problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(intolerance, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(problem, be research problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(homophobia, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(homophobia, has state phobia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(intolerance, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(intolerance, has state problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(intolerance, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(homophobia, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(homophobia, has state problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(apathy, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(homophobia, has state phobia)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(homophobia, has state phobia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(intolerance, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(intolerance, is social problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(intolerance, is issue)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(intolerance, is social problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(intolerance, is social problem)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(intolerance, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(homophobia, has state phobia)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(homophobia, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(apathy, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)