intolerance: is social problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.58
, symptom
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.56
, theme
Weight: 0.55
Siblings lactose
Weight: 0.69
, apathy
Weight: 0.34
, bigotry
Weight: 0.34
, hatred
Weight: 0.33
, homophobia
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is social problem 1.00
is social 0.88
has state problem 0.85
be related to social change 0.83
be different from sociological problems 0.81
be research problem 0.79
be such problem in america 0.79
be different from problems 0.79
solve important for child development 0.76
solve important in workplace 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(intolerance, is social problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(intolerance, is social problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(problem, be different from sociological problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(intolerance, is social problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(intolerance, is social problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(intolerance, is social problem)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(problem, be related to social change)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(problem, solve important in workplace)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(problem, be research problem)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(problem, be different from sociological problems)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(problem, solve important in workplace)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be related to social change)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(homophobia, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(intolerance, is social problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(problem, be related to social change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(intolerance, is social problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(problem, be different from sociological problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(intolerance, is social problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(intolerance, is social problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(intolerance, is social problem)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(homophobia, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(homophobia, has state problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(apathy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(apathy, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(intolerance, is social problem)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is social)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has state problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(intolerance, is social)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(intolerance, is social)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(intolerance, is social)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(intolerance, is social problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(problem, be related to social change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(problem, solve important in workplace)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(problem, be different from sociological problems)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(homophobia, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(apathy, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(problem, be related to social change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(problem, solve important in workplace)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(intolerance, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(problem, be different from sociological problems)
...