iowa: was declared state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ohio
Weight: 0.62
, town
Weight: 0.61
, city
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.60
, missouri
Weight: 0.59
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, michigan
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35
, charleston
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was declared state 1.00
was called state 0.84
be called state 0.81
has state state 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(iowa, was declared state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missouri, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(iowa, was declared state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(iowa, was declared state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, be called state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be called state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, was called state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be called state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(florida, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(iowa, was declared state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missouri, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(iowa, was declared state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(iowa, was declared state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(tennessee, was called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(tennessee, was called state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(connecticut, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(connecticut, be called state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(florida, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(connecticut, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(connecticut, has state state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(michigan, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(michigan, has state state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(iowa, was declared state)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be called state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(iowa, has state state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(iowa, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(iowa, be called state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(iowa, be called state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(iowa, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(iowa, be called state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(iowa, was declared state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(iowa, was declared state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, be called state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(tennessee, was called state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(connecticut, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(connecticut, be called state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, be called state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(iowa, was declared state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)