iso: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents standard
Weight: 0.61
, option
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.58
, cd
Weight: 0.56
, stock option
Weight: 0.55
Siblings xml
Weight: 0.33
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.32
, lcd
Weight: 0.32
, ssl
Weight: 0.32
, mac address
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality cost 0.85
has quality good 0.85
is quality 0.83
has quality better 0.83
has quality bad 0.82
have time value 0.80
lose value 0.76
has quality difference 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stock option, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(iso, has quality worth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(iso, has quality worth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cd, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(iso, has quality worth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(iso, has quality worth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(iso, has quality worth)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(option, have time value)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(option, lose value)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(cd, lose value)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(stock option, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(option, has quality better)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cd, lose value)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(stock option, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(option, lose value)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cd, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(option, has quality better)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ssl, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(xml, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(xml, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lcd, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lcd, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stock option, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(iso, has quality worth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(iso, has quality worth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cd, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(iso, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(iso, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(cd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(iso, has quality worth)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lcd, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(lcd, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(lcd, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(lcd, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(xml, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(xml, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ssl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(ssl, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(xml, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(xml, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(iso, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(iso, has quality better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(iso, is quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(iso, is quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(iso, has quality better)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(iso, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(option, have time value)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(option, lose value)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cd, lose value)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cd, is quality)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(lcd, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lcd, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(ssl, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(xml, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(xml, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(option, have time value)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(option, lose value)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cd, is quality)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(standard, has quality good)
...