jay: be in back canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.63
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, man
Weight: 0.55
, movie
Weight: 0.53
, film
Weight: 0.52
Siblings blue jay
Weight: 0.38
, american robin
Weight: 0.36
, robin
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in back canada 1.00
be in canada 0.96
play in montreal 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(jay, be in back canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(blue jay, play in montreal)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(jay, be in back canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(blue jay, be in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(jay, be in back canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(blue jay, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(blue jay, be in canada)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(jay, be in back canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(blue jay, play in montreal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(blue jay, play in montreal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(jay, be in back canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(jay, be in back canada)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(jay, be in back canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(jay, be in canada)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(jay, be in back canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(jay, be in canada)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(jay, be in back canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(jay, be in canada)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(jay, be in back canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(jay, be in canada)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(jay, be in back canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(jay, play in montreal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(jay, be in back canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(jay, play in montreal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(jay, be in back canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(jay, play in montreal)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(jay, be in back canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(jay, play in montreal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(jay, be in back canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(jay, be in back canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(jay, be in back canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(jay, be in back canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(jay, be in back canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(jay, be in back canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(blue jay, be in canada)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(jay, be in back canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(blue jay, play in montreal)