judge: be selected in florida

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.63
, justice
Weight: 0.61
, trial
Weight: 0.60
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.74
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.64
, marshall
Weight: 0.61
, contestant
Weight: 0.53
, litigant
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be selected in florida 1.00
be selected in georgia 0.88
be in texas chosen 0.86
be selected in north america 0.85
be selected in washington state 0.85
be selected 0.79
is selected 0.79
be in illinois court system chosen 0.79
be in texas 0.77
be in texas elected 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(judge, be selected in florida)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(judge, be selected in georgia)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(judge, be in texas chosen)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(judge, be selected in north america)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(judge, be selected in washington state)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(judge, be in texas chosen)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(judge, be selected in georgia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(judge, be in texas chosen)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(judge, be selected in georgia)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(judge, be selected in washington state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(judge, be selected in north america)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(judge, be selected in washington state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(judge, be selected in north america)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(judge, be in texas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(judge, be in texas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(judge, be in texas)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in georgia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in texas chosen)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in washington state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in north america)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in texas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in florida)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(judge, be selected in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(judge, be selected in florida)