lag: is bad now

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.53
, issue
Weight: 0.52
, factor
Weight: 0.52
, concern
Weight: 0.47
Siblings hiccup
Weight: 0.31
, decline
Weight: 0.31
, friction
Weight: 0.31
, weakness
Weight: 0.31
, volatility
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad now 1.00
be bad today 0.88
has quality bad 0.84
happen at worst times 0.77
is thing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decline, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hiccup, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(friction, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hiccup, is thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(volatility, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(volatility, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(friction, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(friction, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(hiccup, is thing)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(hiccup, is thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hiccup, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hiccup, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(decline, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(decline, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(lag, is bad now)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(lag, be bad today)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lag, be bad today)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(lag, be bad today)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(lag, be bad today)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(lag, is thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(lag, happen at worst times)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(lag, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(lag, happen at worst times)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(lag, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(lag, happen at worst times)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lag, is thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(lag, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(lag, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(lag, happen at worst times)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(lag, is thing)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(lag, is thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lag, is bad now)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(lag, is bad now)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(weakness, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(volatility, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(hiccup, is thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(friction, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hiccup, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lag, is bad now)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(decline, has quality bad)