language: be important in writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents programming language
Weight: 0.85
, english language
Weight: 0.85
, sign language
Weight: 0.81
, subject
Weight: 0.63
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.79
, chinese language
Weight: 0.77
, american sign language
Weight: 0.76
, old english
Weight: 0.75
, haitian creole
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in writing 1.00
be used writing 0.93
be like written right-to-left 0.81
get written 0.80
be written 0.79
be important in poetry 0.79
be important in book things 0.79
be important in literature 0.77
be important in book things fall 0.77
be important in critical thinking process 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(programming language, be written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(language, be important in writing)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(programming language, get written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(language, be important in writing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(programming language, get written)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(programming language, be written)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(programming language, get written)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be written)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(programming language, be written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(language, be important in writing)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(programming language, get written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(language, be important in writing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(language, be important in writing)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(language, be used writing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(language, be used writing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(language, be used writing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(language, be used writing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(language, be important in literature)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(language, be important in poetry)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in poetry)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(language, be important in poetry)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(language, be important in literature)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(language, be important in poetry)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(language, be important in literature)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in literature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(language, be important in writing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(programming language, be written)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(programming language, get written)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(programming language, be written)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(language, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(programming language, get written)