programming language: get written

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.81
, syntax
Weight: 0.67
, computer science
Weight: 0.67
, topic
Weight: 0.64
Siblings source code
Weight: 0.69
, smalltalk
Weight: 0.68
, perl
Weight: 0.68
, lisp
Weight: 0.67
, basic
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
get written 1.00
be written 0.96
be like written right-to-left 0.94
be written in english 0.83
be used writing 0.82
be important in writing 0.80
read left 0.80
be like arabic written right-to-left 0.78
be important in piece writing 0.78
read right left 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(syntax, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(programming language, get written)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(topic, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(programming language, get written)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(syntax, be important in piece writing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(programming language, get written)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(language, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(programming language, get written)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(language, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(programming language, get written)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(language, be used writing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(language, be important in writing)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(topic, be important in writing)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(syntax, be important in writing)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(syntax, be important in piece writing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(language, be used writing)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in writing)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topic, be important in writing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in piece writing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in writing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(syntax, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(programming language, get written)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(topic, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(programming language, get written)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(language, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(programming language, get written)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(syntax, be important in piece writing)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(programming language, get written)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(language, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(programming language, get written)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(programming language, get written)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(programming language, be written)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(programming language, be written)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be written)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be written in english)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(programming language, be written)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(programming language, be written in english)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(programming language, be written in english)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(programming language, be written in english)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(programming language, get written)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(programming language, get written)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(language, be used writing)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(language, be important in writing)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(topic, be important in writing)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in writing)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in piece writing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(language, be used writing)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(language, be important in writing)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(topic, be important in writing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in writing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(programming language, get written)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in piece writing)