law: be best described

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prohibition
Weight: 0.74
, mandate
Weight: 0.68
, amendment
Weight: 0.68
, principle
Weight: 0.66
Siblings common law
Weight: 0.77
, ordinance
Weight: 0.68
, habeas corpus
Weight: 0.66
, freedom
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be best described 1.00
was known as expierment 0.79
be considered 0.76
was regarded as progressive issue 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(law, be best described)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(prohibition, was known as expierment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(law, be best described)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(law, be best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was known as expierment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(law, be best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(law, be best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(law, be best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was known as expierment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(prohibition, was known as expierment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(law, be best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(law, be best described)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(law, be best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(law, be best described)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(law, be best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(law, be best described)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(law, be best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(law, be considered)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(law, be best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(law, be considered)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(law, be best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(law, be considered)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(law, be best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(law, be considered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(law, be best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(law, be best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(law, be best described)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(law, be best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(law, be best described)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(law, be best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(prohibition, was known as expierment)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(law, be best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(law, be best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(prohibition, was known as expierment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(law, be best described) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)