law: be considered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prohibition
Weight: 0.74
, mandate
Weight: 0.68
, amendment
Weight: 0.68
, principle
Weight: 0.66
Siblings common law
Weight: 0.77
, ordinance
Weight: 0.68
, habeas corpus
Weight: 0.66
, freedom
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered 1.00
be considered law 0.81
was regarded as progressive issue 0.80
be regarded as temporary measure 0.79
be considered measures 0.77
was known as expierment 0.76
be svu 0.76
be best described 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(law, be considered)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(prohibition, was known as expierment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(law, be considered)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was known as expierment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was known as expierment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ordinance, be regarded as temporary measure)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ordinance, be considered measures)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(law, be considered)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(prohibition, was known as expierment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(law, be considered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(ordinance, be regarded as temporary measure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(ordinance, be regarded as temporary measure)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(ordinance, be considered measures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(ordinance, be considered measures)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(law, be considered)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(law, be best described)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(law, be best described)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(law, be best described)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(law, be best described)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(law, be considered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(law, be considered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(prohibition, was known as expierment)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(ordinance, be considered measures)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(ordinance, be regarded as temporary measure)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(prohibition, was known as expierment)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(law, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(prohibition, was regarded as progressive issue)