leader: were chosen in rome

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents religious leader
Weight: 0.77
, position
Weight: 0.63
, manager
Weight: 0.61
, candidate
Weight: 0.60
Siblings prime minister
Weight: 0.70
, leadership
Weight: 0.70
, politician
Weight: 0.69
, mentor
Weight: 0.67
, king
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
were chosen in rome 1.00
were chosen in egypt 0.87
be chosen in france 0.84
were chosen in ancient egypt 0.84
be selected in italy 0.83
be chosen in colombia 0.82
be in ireland selected 0.82
be chosen in canada 0.81
be selected in france 0.81
be selected in britain 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(leader, were chosen in rome)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(leader, be in ireland selected)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(leader, be chosen in france)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(leader, be selected in italy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(leader, be chosen in canada)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(leader, be chosen in france)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(leader, be in ireland selected)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(leader, be in ireland selected)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(leader, be chosen in canada)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(leader, be in ireland selected)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(leader, be chosen in colombia)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(leader, be selected in france)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(leader, be selected in france)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(leader, be selected in italy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(leader, be chosen in france)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(leader, be selected in italy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(leader, be chosen in france)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(leader, be chosen in canada)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(leader, be chosen in canada)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(leader, be chosen in colombia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(leader, be selected in italy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(leader, be selected in france)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(leader, be chosen in colombia)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(leader, be selected in france)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(leader, be chosen in colombia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(leader, were chosen in rome)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(leader, were chosen in rome)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(leader, were chosen in rome)