leverage: be important to business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, risk
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, show
Weight: 0.55
Siblings influence
Weight: 0.34
, visibility
Weight: 0.33
, attribute
Weight: 0.32
, experience
Weight: 0.32
, momentum
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to business 1.00
be important in business 0.99
be important to financial management 0.79
be good for company 0.78
be important to management 0.78
be important in finance 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attribute, be important in business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(experience, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important to business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(attribute, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(experience, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(experience, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(leverage, be important to business)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(leverage, be important in business)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(leverage, be important in business)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important in business)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important in business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(leverage, be important to financial management)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(leverage, be good for company)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(leverage, be important to management)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(leverage, be important in finance)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to management)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(leverage, be good for company)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to financial management)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important to management)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(leverage, be important in finance)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important to financial management)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important in finance)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to financial management)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important in finance)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(experience, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(leverage, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)