leverage: be good for company

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, risk
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, show
Weight: 0.55
Siblings influence
Weight: 0.34
, visibility
Weight: 0.33
, attribute
Weight: 0.32
, experience
Weight: 0.32
, momentum
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for company 1.00
be important in business 0.79
be important to business 0.78
has quality good 0.78
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(leverage, be good for company)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(leverage, be good for company)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(leverage, be good for company)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(risk, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(leverage, be good for company)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(influence, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attribute, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(experience, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(visibility, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(risk, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(risk, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(leverage, be good for company)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(visibility, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(visibility, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(attribute, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(experience, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(experience, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(experience, be important in business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(influence, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(influence, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(experience, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(leverage, be good for company)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(leverage, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(leverage, be important in business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(leverage, be important to business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(leverage, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(leverage, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(leverage, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(leverage, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(leverage, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(leverage, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(leverage, be important in business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(leverage, be important to business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important in business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(leverage, be important to business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important in business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be important to business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(leverage, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(leverage, be good for company)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(risk, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(influence, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(visibility, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(experience, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(experience, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(risk, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(leverage, be good for company)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)