libel: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tort
Weight: 0.66
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, action
Weight: 0.58
, injury
Weight: 0.57
Siblings court case
Weight: 0.33
, perjury
Weight: 0.32
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.32
, litigation
Weight: 0.32
, negligence
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(injury, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(libel, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(libel, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(injury, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(injury, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(perjury, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(injury, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(libel, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(libel, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(perjury, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(perjury, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(negligence, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(libel, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(libel, has quality good)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(libel, has quality good)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(libel, has quality good)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(libel, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(libel, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(libel, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(injury, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(perjury, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(negligence, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(libel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(injury, has quality bad)