management: be important factor in activity

Related concepts

Parents	industry Weight: 0.64 , solution Weight: 0.62 , variable Weight: 0.62 , business activity Weight: 0.62
Siblings	storage Weight: 0.59 , neo Weight: 0.38 , banking industry Weight: 0.34 , operating system Weight: 0.33 , internet service provider Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important factor in activity	1.00
be primary component in activity	0.88
be important factor in entrepreneurial activity	0.87
be considered as activity	0.86
be called group activity	0.82
be considered as secondary activity	0.82
be primary component in entrepreneurial activity	0.81
be important 40	0.78
be necessary component of computer	0.76
is good important	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(management, be important factor in activity)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(industry, be important 40) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(management, be important factor in activity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(industry, be important 40)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(industry, be considered as secondary activity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(industry, be important 40)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(industry, be considered as secondary activity)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(storage, be necessary component of computer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(industry, be considered as secondary activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(management, be important factor in activity)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(industry, be important 40) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(management, be important factor in activity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(storage, be necessary component of computer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(storage, be necessary component of computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(management, be important factor in activity)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(management, be primary component in activity)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(management, be important factor in entrepreneurial activity)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(management, be called group activity)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(management, be primary component in entrepreneurial activity)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(management, be called group activity)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(management, is good important)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(management, be called group activity)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(management, be important factor in entrepreneurial activity)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(management, be called group activity)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(management, be primary component in activity)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(management, be important factor in entrepreneurial activity)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(management, be important factor in entrepreneurial activity)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(management, be primary component in entrepreneurial activity)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(management, is good important)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(management, be primary component in activity)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(management, be primary component in activity)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(management, be primary component in entrepreneurial activity)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(management, is good important)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(management, be primary component in entrepreneurial activity)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(management, is good important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(management, be important factor in activity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(management, be important factor in activity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(industry, be considered as secondary activity)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(industry, be important 40)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(storage, be necessary component of computer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(industry, be considered as secondary activity)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(management, be important factor in activity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(industry, be important 40)