manager: be important to organization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents representative
Weight: 0.68
, executive
Weight: 0.65
, boss
Weight: 0.63
, employee
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
Siblings owner
Weight: 0.65
, director
Weight: 0.38
, administrator
Weight: 0.35
, president
Weight: 0.35
, vice president
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to organization 1.00
be important to organization 's success 0.89
be important to organizations 0.86
be necessary in organizations 0.82
plan in organizations 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(employee, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(manager, be important to organization)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(employee, be important to organization)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to organization)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(employee, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(manager, be important to organization)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(manager, be important to organization)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(manager, be necessary in organizations)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manager, be important to organizations)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(manager, be important to organizations)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(manager, be necessary in organizations)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(manager, be necessary in organizations)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(manager, plan in organizations)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(manager, be important to organizations)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(manager, be necessary in organizations)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(manager, be important to organizations)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(manager, plan in organizations)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(manager, plan in organizations)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(manager, plan in organizations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(manager, be important to organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(manager, be important to organization)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(employee, be important to organization)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(manager, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(employee, be important to organization)