manager: plan in organizations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents representative
Weight: 0.68
, executive
Weight: 0.65
, boss
Weight: 0.63
, employee
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
Siblings owner
Weight: 0.65
, director
Weight: 0.38
, administrator
Weight: 0.35
, president
Weight: 0.35
, vice president
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
plan in organizations 1.00
be necessary in organizations 0.89
be important to organizations 0.88
have plan 0.84
plan 0.83
need plan 0.83
be important to organization 0.77
plan effectively in dynamic environment 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(employee, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(manager, plan in organizations)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(employee, be important to organization)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to organization)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(employee, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(manager, plan in organizations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(manager, plan in organizations)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(manager, be necessary in organizations)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manager, be important to organizations)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(manager, be necessary in organizations)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(manager, have plan)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(manager, plan)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(manager, need plan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(manager, be important to organization)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manager, plan effectively in dynamic environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(manager, plan)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(manager, be necessary in organizations)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(manager, be necessary in organizations)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(manager, plan)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(manager, plan)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(manager, be important to organizations)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(manager, have plan)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(manager, be important to organizations)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(manager, have plan)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(manager, need plan)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(manager, be important to organizations)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(manager, need plan)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(manager, have plan)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(manager, need plan)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(manager, plan effectively in dynamic environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(manager, be important to organization)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(manager, plan effectively in dynamic environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(manager, plan effectively in dynamic environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(manager, be important to organization)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(manager, be important to organization)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(manager, plan in organizations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(manager, plan in organizations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(employee, be important to organization)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(manager, plan in organizations)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(employee, be important to organization)