mango: be good for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.71
, flavor
Weight: 0.69
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.69
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.64
, dish
Weight: 0.64
Siblings coconut
Weight: 0.39
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38
, crab apple
Weight: 0.38
, pomegranate
Weight: 0.38
, coconut milk
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for us 1.00
get water in them 0.81
go bad 0.80
be good for children 0.80
is really expensive 0.80
has quality good 0.80
be good for heart 0.79
have water in them 0.79
be good for dogs 0.78
be good for body 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mango, be good for us)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fruit, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mango, be good for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(fruit, be good for heart)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good for heart)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coconut, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(coconut, be good for dogs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(coconut, get water in them)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pomegranate, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(coconut, have water in them)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mango, be good for us)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fruit, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mango, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(coconut milk, go bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(coconut milk, go bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(coconut, go bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(coconut, go bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(coconut, get water in them)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(coconut, get water in them)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(coconut, have water in them)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(coconut, have water in them)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(coconut, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(coconut, be good for dogs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(pomegranate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pomegranate, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(coconut milk, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(mango, be good for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mango, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fruit, be good for heart)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(coconut milk, go bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(coconut, have water in them)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(coconut, go bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(coconut, get water in them)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(coconut, be good for dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(pomegranate, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(coconut milk, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fruit, be good for heart)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(mango, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)