manure: be used as fertilizer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fertilizer
Weight: 0.62
, raw material
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.56
, option
Weight: 0.55
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.35
, ammonia
Weight: 0.35
, ammonium nitrate
Weight: 0.35
, dairy product
Weight: 0.34
, fecal matter
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used as fertilizer 1.00
make fertilizer 0.96
be different from fertilizer 0.96
make good fertilizer 0.95
be better than fertilizer 0.94
be better than fertilizers 0.89
preferred for fertilizers 0.89
be better than chemical fertilizers 0.88
is added to soil in farm 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(ammonia, be used as fertilizer)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ammonium nitrate, be used as fertilizer)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(ammonia, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(ammonia, be used as fertilizer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ammonium nitrate, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ammonium nitrate, be used as fertilizer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(manure, be used as fertilizer)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manure, make fertilizer)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(manure, be different from fertilizer)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(manure, make good fertilizer)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(manure, be better than fertilizer)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(manure, make fertilizer)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(manure, preferred for fertilizers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(manure, be better than fertilizers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(manure, is added to soil in farm)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(manure, make fertilizer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(manure, be better than fertilizer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(manure, make good fertilizer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(manure, be different from fertilizer)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(manure, be better than fertilizers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(manure, be better than fertilizer)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(manure, be better than fertilizer)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(manure, preferred for fertilizers)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(manure, make good fertilizer)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(manure, be different from fertilizer)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(manure, make good fertilizer)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(manure, be better than fertilizers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(manure, is added to soil in farm)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(manure, make fertilizer)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(manure, be better than fertilizers)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(manure, be different from fertilizer)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(manure, is added to soil in farm)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(manure, preferred for fertilizers)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(manure, is added to soil in farm)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(manure, preferred for fertilizers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(manure, be used as fertilizer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ammonium nitrate, be used as fertilizer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(ammonia, be used as fertilizer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(compost, be better than fertilizer)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers)