compost: be better than chemical fertilizers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.63
, amendment
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, raw material
Weight: 0.57
, waste
Weight: 0.56
Siblings composting
Weight: 0.35
, manure
Weight: 0.35
, fertilizer
Weight: 0.34
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, human waste
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than chemical fertilizers 1.00
be better than fertilizer 0.92
preferred for fertilizers 0.90
be used as fertilizer 0.88
be different from chemical fertizer 0.84
contain nitrogen 0.78
supply minerals to crop plants 0.78
be better than compost 0.77
have phosphorus 0.77
contain ammonium salts 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(waste, be used as fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(waste, be used as fertilizer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(waste, be used as fertilizer)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(manure, be different from chemical fertizer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, contain ammonium salts)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, contain nitrogen)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(manure, preferred for fertilizers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be used as fertilizer)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be better than compost)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, supply minerals to crop plants)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(manure, be better than fertilizer)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, have phosphorus)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(waste, be used as fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(manure, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(manure, be better than fertilizer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(manure, be used as fertilizer)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(human waste, be used as fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(human waste, be used as fertilizer)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(manure, preferred for fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(manure, preferred for fertilizers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(manure, be different from chemical fertizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(manure, be different from chemical fertizer)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fertilizer, have phosphorus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, have phosphorus)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(fertilizer, contain nitrogen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, contain nitrogen)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(fertilizer, supply minerals to crop plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, supply minerals to crop plants)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fertilizer, contain ammonium salts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, contain ammonium salts)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fertilizer, be better than compost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, be better than compost)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(compost, be better than fertilizer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(compost, be better than fertilizer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(waste, be used as fertilizer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(manure, be used as fertilizer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fertilizer, have phosphorus)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(human waste, be used as fertilizer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(manure, be better than fertilizer)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fertilizer, contain nitrogen)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(manure, be different from chemical fertizer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fertilizer, contain ammonium salts)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(manure, preferred for fertilizers)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(fertilizer, supply minerals to crop plants)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be better than compost)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(waste, be used as fertilizer)