manure: be better than chemical fertilizers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fertilizer
Weight: 0.62
, raw material
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.56
, option
Weight: 0.55
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.35
, ammonia
Weight: 0.35
, ammonium nitrate
Weight: 0.35
, dairy product
Weight: 0.34
, fecal matter
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than chemical fertilizers 1.00
be better than fertilizers 0.97
be better than fertilizer 0.92
preferred for fertilizers 0.90
be different from fertilizer 0.89
make fertilizer 0.88
be used as fertilizer 0.88
make good fertilizer 0.88
be different from chemical fertizer 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(ammonia, be used as fertilizer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ammonium nitrate, be used as fertilizer)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(compost, be better than fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(compost, be better than fertilizer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(ammonia, be used as fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(ammonia, be used as fertilizer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ammonium nitrate, be used as fertilizer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ammonium nitrate, be used as fertilizer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(manure, be better than fertilizers)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(manure, be better than fertilizers)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(manure, be used as fertilizer)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(manure, make fertilizer)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(manure, be better than fertilizer)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(manure, be better than fertilizers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(manure, be better than fertilizer)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(manure, be used as fertilizer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(manure, be used as fertilizer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(manure, make fertilizer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(manure, be different from chemical fertizer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(manure, be different from fertilizer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(manure, be better than fertilizer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(manure, preferred for fertilizers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(manure, be different from fertilizer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(manure, make good fertilizer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(manure, make good fertilizer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(manure, be different from chemical fertizer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(manure, be different from chemical fertizer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(manure, preferred for fertilizers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(manure, make good fertilizer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(manure, be different from chemical fertizer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(manure, make fertilizer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(manure, preferred for fertilizers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(manure, be different from fertilizer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(manure, preferred for fertilizers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(manure, be better than fertilizers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(manure, be different from fertilizer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(manure, be better than fertilizer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(manure, make good fertilizer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manure, make fertilizer)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(manure, be used as fertilizer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ammonium nitrate, be used as fertilizer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(compost, be better than fertilizer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(ammonia, be used as fertilizer)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(manure, be better than chemical fertilizers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(compost, be better than chemical fertilizers)