map: be useful to historians

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.62
, publication
Weight: 0.61
Siblings polygon
Weight: 0.50
, classifier
Weight: 0.48
, mercator projection
Weight: 0.46
, tau
Weight: 0.41
, seine
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful to historians 1.00
was useful to historians 0.99
be important to historians 0.97
be useful to scientists 0.81
be useful to geographers 0.79
be valuable tool for geographers 0.79
be important to archaeologists 0.78
be useful 0.78
is useful 0.78
be useful to people 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(artifact, be important to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(map, be useful to historians)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(artifact, was useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(map, be useful to historians)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(artifact, be important to archaeologists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(map, be useful to historians)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(artifact, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(map, be useful to historians)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(tool, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(map, be useful to historians)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(artifact, was useful to historians)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(artifact, be important to historians)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(tool, be useful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(artifact, be useful to people)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(artifact, be important to archaeologists)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be important to historians)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(artifact, was useful to historians)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, be useful)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be useful to people)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(polygon, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(artifact, was useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(map, be useful to historians)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(artifact, be important to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(map, be useful to historians)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(artifact, be important to archaeologists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(map, be useful to historians)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(artifact, be useful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(map, be useful to historians)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(tool, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(map, be useful to historians)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(polygon, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(polygon, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(map, be useful to historians)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(map, be important to historians)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(map, be important to historians)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(map, be important to historians)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(map, be important to historians)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(map, be useful)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(map, be useful to scientists)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(map, be useful to geographers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(map, be useful to geographers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(map, be useful to scientists)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(map, is useful)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(map, be useful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(map, be useful to scientists)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(map, be useful to geographers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(map, is useful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(map, be useful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(map, is useful)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(map, be useful to scientists)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(map, be useful to geographers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(map, be useful)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(map, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(map, be useful to historians)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(map, be useful to historians)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(artifact, be useful to people)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tool, be useful)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(artifact, was useful to historians)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(artifact, be important to historians)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(artifact, be important to archaeologists)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(polygon, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(artifact, was useful to historians)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(artifact, be important to historians)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(artifact, be useful to people)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tool, be useful)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(map, be useful to historians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(artifact, be important to archaeologists)