marmot: be at pet zoo

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.56
, wildlife
Weight: 0.50
, bird
Weight: 0.49
, rodent
Weight: 0.49
, company
Weight: 0.48
Siblings groundhog
Weight: 0.60
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.35
, cougar
Weight: 0.35
, coyote
Weight: 0.34
, beaver
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at pet zoo 1.00
be at zoo 0.93
zoo 0.93
be find in zoo 0.91
wants to go to zoo 0.90
be pet 0.90
be used to keep in zoo 0.89
be used to pet 0.89
be at pet store 0.88
be person pet 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(animal, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(animal, zoo)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bird, be pet)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(animal, be find in zoo)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(animal, be at zoo)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bird, be at zoo)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(animal, wants to go to zoo)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bird, be at zoo)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(animal, wants to go to zoo)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(animal, be at zoo)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(animal, be find in zoo)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(animal, zoo)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(animal, be at pet store)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(bird, be pet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(animal, be pet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(animal, be used to pet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(bird, be at zoo)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at zoo)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(animal, zoo)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animal, be find in zoo)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(animal, wants to go to zoo)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bird, be pet)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at pet store)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be pet)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to pet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, zoo)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at zoo)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(animal, be at zoo)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bird, be at zoo)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(animal, zoo)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(animal, be find in zoo)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(animal, wants to go to zoo)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(animal, be pet)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bird, be pet)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(animal, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(beaver, be at zoo)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at zoo)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(groundhog, zoo)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(groundhog, zoo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(marmot, be at pet zoo)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at zoo)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(marmot, be at zoo)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at zoo)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(marmot, be at zoo)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal, be used to pet)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be pet)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bird, be pet)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(animal, zoo)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(animal, be find in zoo)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(animal, be at zoo)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(animal, be at pet store)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(animal, wants to go to zoo)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bird, be at zoo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(groundhog, zoo)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(beaver, be at zoo)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(animal, zoo)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal, be used to pet)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be pet)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(animal, be at zoo)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(animal, be find in zoo)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bird, be pet)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bird, be at zoo)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(animal, be at pet store)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(marmot, be at pet zoo)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(animal, wants to go to zoo)